Hot off the press. Mike Lindells Lawsuit against the Voting machine companies and likely the opening salvo in his legal battles. (link below) This is his First Amendment case that will contend that the companies are in effect extensions of government due to their agreements, contracts and the nature of their work. It is being filed in response to the SLAPP suits the companies have filed against many people including Mike himself. A SLAPP suit is a "Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation". They are designed to silence speech and criticism. The general idea is refered to in the suit as "Lawfare"
Shiva also has a case that's turning on First Amendment grounds as well.
I'm told there is nice information inside, but I haven't read it yet.
This is a very readable document and it gives an excellent synopsis of the investigation into the election up until now. I was aware of most information in this and I look forward to the evidence of the cyber attacks being presented because at this point I'm unable to test the validity of that information myself. A couple of things jumped out at me.
from pg 43: "...Dominion denies the public access to the evidence to substantiate that it has been hacked. It silences anyone who makes this claim while simultaneously denying access to the key information one way or the other."
from pg 73: " 142. The “Support and Advocacy” clause of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) provides as
[I]f two or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat,
any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or
advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor or the election of any lawfully
qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President …; or to injure
any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; …
if any one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act
in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in
his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or
privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived
shall have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury
or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.