Justsomeguy

It’s taken me a bit to sort out the AZ audit results and everything that happened surrounding them. I try to keep this stuff short, but if you are going to understand it, you are going to have to invest some time. I pointed out a few days before the briefing, that Jovan Pulitzer wasn’t on the briefing list. Jovan wasn’t a direct participant in the audit but his technology was in use, and apparently he was doing the analysis of the collected data and writing the summation of findings from his equipment. It was looking like his findings wouldn’t be presented. They weren't

There was a leak of a report a day or so before the results and the bullet taken from that was that the counts pretty much matched what Maricopa County had, and Biden won - so there. Hold on. This wasn’t a recount. We’ve done those to death for decades without much result. This was to be a “full forensic audit”. Well it was supposed to be anyway. It was more thorough than anything has been done historically. A good deal of the electronic components were withheld from the audit team and there was no cooperation that would have allowed misconceptions to be quickly cleared up.

In the hours before the presentation another “real” summation document began circulating and it came from reliable sources. Apparently Doug Logan was threatened by an AZ Senate attorney to remove several comments including this one: “ Based on these factual findings, the election should not be certified, and the reported results are

not reliable.” Mmmmmm…… This is a McCain connected attorney and the threat was reportedly to remove his lawsuit protection provided by the Senate.

It is very possible that we have good guy and bad guy games being played with all of that. I spend a lot of time thinking on this stuff and I have a whole lot of headaches. It is very difficult to figure who is maneuvering while watching from the sidelines.

Having now seen the briefing and studied the material, my overall conclusion is that I agree. This should not be a certifiable election result.

I’ll address the electronic findings first, or at least a few of them. Although there were a number of significant findings on the electronic front, we still do not have a clear picture of what was happening there. I’m actually afraid of one of the more significant findings and that was that the election results were deleted from the Election Management Server. Maricopa has already lead with the line that “yes, we deleted that, but we have the archive. You didn’t subpoena the archive.” I can almost guarantee that the election results are no longer on the Tarrant county server either. Our results are on removable drives and they are removed and stored.

Even with traps like that, I think there are some very significant findings. Just one as an example is that certain access security logs were over written. The auditors have video of the person doing it and it is obvious subterfuge. It’s also an issue that will make lawyers rich arguing over it. Another piece of equipment that was used in adjudication had two drives installed. The significance is that the machine was capable of a dual boot and each drive had different systems on it. One of the drives also had WA and SC voter data on it. Say what!!!???? In AZ? how do you explain that? Then we get to common passwords used by multiple people and the fact that the County didn’t posses the main Admin passwords which are pretty serious on their own. There is a reason that the Admin password thing is a real thing. There’s enough here on the electronics that I want to throw all of the stuff in the crusher. There’s no such thing as an “air gap” and even in the largest counties, they are no match for nation state level, or major corporate actors. When you are dealing with our elections, those are your adversaries. This county can't even get secure passwords so we know who did what.

The main findings weren’t in the electronics, but that there are numerous irregularities in the people casting votes, and with the ballots received. Dr. Shiva did a presentation that is painful to watch due to the detail where he showed enough ballot envelope irregularities that the presidential race is in question from that alone. He identified 17000 duplicate votes as well as other anomalies. What isn’t said is that every down ballot race is easily in question now including two of those County Commissioners who only won by a few hundred votes. This is where the attack should now be in my opinion.

After Shiva, Doug Logan told us of tens of thousands of other questionable votes from voters who had voted from previous addresses or from out of state. These easily could sway the presidential and senatorial election and again likely did sway the down ballot races. This needs to be followed up with a detailed canvass of those voters. This was not a full audit, because that wasn’t done. We do have Liz Harris’s canvass that did not address specific issues, but found the potential for thousands of fake votes. We need a specific canvass now to prove this up.

Even without that canvass, my signature would not have gone on the certification of this election. The result is unknowable for any race on the ballot.

I was distracted for a bit during the presentation, but I heard at one point that 100% of the paper used in the election was not as specified. We know that there was a detailed examination of the paper done and that was discussed in the briefing, but there were no details provided. Section 5.7.5 of Vol 3 of the report addresses this, but in limited detail. Some of this is because all the reports aren’t finalized, but also because there was apparent pressure to glaze over these details. Pulitzers initial 80 page report is no where to be seen. There is an issue with misprinting the ballots that has to do with the placement of ovals that I just don’t have the energy to get into just now.

This is a link to a video of Patrick Byrne, Jovan Puluitzer and Joe Flynn, Gen Michael Flynn’s brother. They are discussing the results and the way the media spun them. The whole thing runs an hour and 24 minutes. The first part addresses the media spin. I have some reservations about some of what they are saying, but they are smarter and more informed than me so there is that. The second part that begins at about the 50 min mark is a must see in my opinion. It addresses the paper and associated issues in some depth. They also explain that only 3 of 13 or so studies on the actual ballots are complete. I’m not sure that its’ after the 50 min point but they do stress that what is presented is not the most damaging information they will have. None the less, this is very damaging. VERY damaging. I think it’s conclusive. Watch the video. It also explains at least one reason that the admin password was a key issue. I have also just learned that part of Jovans findings are going to bypass the senate entirely and go straight to the AG. I find that most interesting. That is not in the video.

https://rumble.com/vmydr7-forensic-audit-aftermath-top-12-lies-and-truths.html

This is a link to all three hours of the audit presentation.

https://rumble.com/vmxlxh-arizona-audit-report-hearing-24-sept-21.html

And this site holds the official presentations and reports:

https://www.azsenaterepublicans.com/audit

The "real" report
the_real_version_092421.pdf

There was pretty big news out of AZ today. Liz Harris who has worked on canvassing the voter roles since the early days of this has released a report. This work is independent of the audit

Her report found that there were an extensive number of votes that just don't seem to have been counted. They contacted 964 voters who were shown not to have voted and found that 34.2% of them said they did vote. When extrapolated using valid statistical polling measures, that could be 173,104 votes missing from legitimate voters. A very significant number.

They contacted people at addresses that supposedly voted by mail and found that 5% of them were not at the addresses listed. That would extrapolate to more than 70K votes.

There were a variety of other issues found that could add another 60K or more questionable votes to the total. We’re talking some whacked out numbers.

I love Liz and consider her to be a national hero, but I’m not as excited about this as many folks are. Mostly because those big numbers are statistical extrapolations and statistics often don’t play well in courts. Statistics only play well when the media choose to push them and here they definitely won’t.

I do think this is a likely a foreshadow of what to expect from the audit and will likely support its findings.

There’s fraud out there. Lots of it.

The cover on that report has a picture of a lot that is the address of a registered voter. There's actually a lot of that. There are signs that rental houses have many problem registrants too.

maricopa-county-canvass-report-final-090821.pdf

There is a lot of good stuff happening. Evidence - you know - that stuff that there is none of, continues to pour in. In fact I’m having a hard time keeping up with it.

On the other hand there are some set backs too, some of which are to be expected some are a downer. The first one is a downer. The GA senate election case that was a very good one was dismissed on Monday. The reason is that the Warnock and the other Senator that “won” had not been served with the papers, so the judge applied the doctrine of latches somehow. So now it looks like if you can avoid service long enough, you can make your opponents lawsuit go away. That’s easier to do when you can hide behind a Capitol police force. Good to know. Favrito has filed a request for immediate access to the ballots in Fulton County. That may be just the mail in ballots, but that’s where the action is. There is new stuff coming out of GA all the time. That place is a mess, as is MI and PA. Much worse than AZ which is bad on it’s own

In PA State Senator Doug Mastriano,issued a request for the election machines, ballots and other election information from 5 counties in his state for the purposes of an audit. As the head of one of their committees, he’s apparently authorized to do that. The SoS immediately sent out guidance for the counties to refuse to do so and among other things threatened that they would have their equipment decertified and the state would not provide funds for replacement. Two of the counties, and they are red counties at that, have stated that they will not comply. Some of this may be wanting additional cover. Many people think that if a subpoena were issued it would provide that cover and they would comply, but there are issues in at least one of their responses that is bothersome. Their agreement with the equipment company precludes them from allowing outside examination of that equipment. They do not have the right to examine the things they use to certify your vote and our elections. How’s that for nonsense. This is not over and the subpoena may be coming soon. PA is vitally important with its 20 electoral votes.

In MI it looks like there are 5 counties that have or might do the “preventative maintenance” despite DePerno’s cease and desist order. Also DePerno has announced that he’s running for SoS there. I think he would be good at that, and particularly there, but I hate to think it might distract him from this fight.

We are making progress because we are keeping the pressure up. This link will help demonstrate that.  

https://creativedestructionmedia.com/video/2021/07/20/io-episode-44-interview-with-ga-state-senator-brandon-beach-on-2020-election-aftermath/

This is Mat DePerno that is the lead attorney in the MI lawsuit. There is no one involved in this, that I have more faith in than him. He is releasing significant information this morning. This morning he's telling us that they have evidence of remote access to the Election Management Systems in MI, AZ and GA. He states that he'll have the evidence up soon and I have faith in that, all of his claims to date are available on the web and most have sworn affidavits and court filings along with his statements. I’m sure the documentation for this will be presented soon too.

The news about the voter role data base being accessed in AZ really shouldn't be a surprise. There has been some talk of related issues there for months. the fact that the SoS is aware of them and still tells us everything is hunky dory is a horse of a different color.

DePerno, has not been directly involved in the AZ audits, but of course everyone is sharing information and some of the same experts are involved in both locations. There are rumors that the people raising money for the AZ audit have been slow to disburse what they are collecting. That is the reason he is taking the action he is.

I have never really contributed to political stuff. Maybe $25 here or there and that's about it. I am putting my money where my mouth is and that is going to DePerno, Shiva, Garland Favrito @ Voter GA. I have a big mouth and I’m trying to match it in contributions. There are links to all of those folks on JustSomeGuy under links. I’ll ad that Shiva has accomplished a lot and isn’t getting much love. He has the only active federal court lawsuits currently working and he is doing well with them. The other two are killing it too in different ways. FWIW, DePerno is burning through $125K a week. This is mostly for experts, secure locations and lot’s of expensive security. Some of these experts will not work without top level protection apparently

https://rumble.com/vjg74l-breaking-security-breach-in-az-hidden-from-the-public.html